jump to: The Design Review process occurs in several stages and increasing levels of detail. Each of the stages described below is used to help give feedback to groups and highlight issues and problems that may occur during design and fabrication. Every group will be proposing different solutions, and different instructors and TAs will highlight different areas of concern (occasionally conflicting with one another!) Part of the experience of the course is to learn to listen to constructive comments from a variety of sources and learn to judge the relative importance of each part of feedback by the course instructors. (note that all of the content does not have to be discussed in this order, but all material is expected to be known by the group and may be discussed during the Formal Design Review) PHYS 253 – Introduction to Instrument Design summer 2009 Design Review Requirements updated 2009 May 28 The Design Review process occurs in several stages and increasing levels of detail. Each of the stages described below is used to help give feedback to groups and highlight issues and problems that may occur during design and fabrication. Every group will be proposing different solutions, and different instructors and TAs will highlight different areas of concern (occasionally conflicting with one another!) Part of the experience of the course is to learn to listen to constructive comments from a variety of sources and learn to judge the relative importance of each part of feedback by the course instructors. # Type of Review Date Duration Reviewer 1 Pre-Review Any time during Lab 5 week A or B ~15 min Call over at least 2 instructors or TAs 2 Formal Review Signup Schedule – Week 6/7 (Lab5 Week B, or following) 1 hr 2 Instructors or TAs. 3 Design Document 4 Final Report 1. PRE-REVIEW Time: ▪ 10-15min discussion with at least 2 course instructors Expected: ▪ Verbal overview of robot function ▪ Sketches of primary mechanical mechanisms ▪ Block diagrams showing major electronic circuits, ▪ Primary operational/software flowchart diagram ▪ Major technical resources required (# and type of motors, types of sensors, linear stages/arms, items not supplied in lectures) Outcome: ▪ Identify the major problem areas to investigate in preparation for Formal Review, including: o Most likely areas with mechanical alignment and robustness issues o Motor control and sensitivity issues o Electronics difficulties o Sensor difficulty o Difficulty in programming and algorithm development 2. FORMAL REVIEW Time: ▪ 10 min presentation, followed by ~45 min discussion Expected: ▪ Printed / hand drawn version of all mechanical components and method of mounting key components together. ▪ Electronic schematics, including block-diagram of wiring showing connections between PCBs. ▪ Motor and force calculations where appropriate A rough draft is fine as long as it includes all relevant information. The final document will be handed in later. You should emphasize the application of engineering theory to your design – show calculations and estimates wherever applicable. If calculations are missing you can expect to be asked to do them on the spot! Expected Content (note that all of the content does not have to be discussed in this order, but all material is expected to be known by the group and may be discussed during the Formal Design Review) a. Description of functions and basic strategy. i. Calculations of round trip time, and estimated score achieved by the Robot ii. Most likely sources of issues and problems in strategy. b. Chassis i. Location of critical elements on the robot (wheels, arms, sensors, etc) ii. Listing of each chassis component iii. Areas of chassis design which allow for flexibility during performance (e.g. wheel mounts, wheel diameter size changes, external gearing of motors,sensor remounting, etc) iv. Materials to be used for construction v. Method of fabricating each component vi. Method of attaching each component (screws, spot welding) vii. Method of assembly (i.e .what order to assemble the different components together. Occasionally teams will want to combine different components in a configuration that cannot be accessed by screws or welding electrodes) viii. Components disassembled regularly for maintenance (i.e. easy access for critical elements like motors, HandyBoards, batteries, etc) c. Drive System i. Steering method and geometry ii. Transmission (direct, gears, pulleys) – include calculations of expected performance based on chosen gear ratio, motor torque, mass of robot, wheel size etc. iii. Motors (type, number, voltage/current/power required for 1 round) iv. Motor and wheel mounting v. Wheel size selection (estimate maximum speed, acceleration) d. Object handling mechanism i. Sketch of mechanical design ii. Description of how mechanism will work iii. Drive mechanism and associated transmission (DC motor? Servo? Gears?) iv. Calculations of operating parameters (e.g. how much motor torque is required to raise the object?) e. Sensor systems i. IR sensors ii. Tape sensors iii. Collision detectors iv. Edge-of-surface detectors v. Object detection f. Circuits – general schematics are expected for the following i. Motor drive circuit ii. IR detection circuit iii. Steering control circuit (if applicable) iv. Sensor circuits v. Any other circuits vi. Wiring harness (i.e. a block diagram showing each PCB to be manufactured, and the wiring which will connect every PCB in the circuit). g. Software code and algorithm i. Flowchart of code – if you can include detail on control algorithms at this point go ahead. ii. Error handling algorithms: 1. algorithm when tape is lost 2. algorithm for deciding between tape tracks 3. algorithm for doing 180deg turn on tape 4. algorithm for missed object 5. avoiding falling off the playing surface (edge-sensors) iii. Digital/Analog/Motor control specification – include a table showing all expected I/O from the Handyboard and which sensors will be used h. Team Responsibilities, Major Milestones, and Timeline i. How are tasks divided among all 3 or 4 group members ii. 4 or 5 major milestones and target dates. E.g. ▪ Chassis, drive motors and wheels mounted ▪ Power circuits complete ▪ Chassis following tape ▪ Pickup mechanism complete ▪ Software can enter into various states based on manually generating sensor inputs. 3. DESIGN DOCUMENT To be handed in as a record of the design review process. Material from the design document can be used in the final report to be handed in at the conclusion of the course. Examples of design documents will be available for viewing in Hebb 42. ** The most successful design documents are the ones which provide documentation that is usable ** Do not spend excess amounts of time formatting text and getting documentation down – instead, focus on producing content and plans which are used to plan, fabricate and test your robot. 4. FINAL REPORT A final report is to be handed in no later than 1 week after the completion of the course. The Final Report is NOT marked, but represents the only document which the group is allowed to take at the completion of the course. 1. Informal Pre-Review
Expected:
Outcome:
2. Formal Discussion
Expected:
Areas of Discussion for Formal Review / Design Document
Key elements to the Formal Review and Design Document
Comments from Design Reviews from Previous Years:
3. Design Document
- Home
- ProjectLab
- ENPH 479 (Fall 2019)
- ENPH 459 (Fall 2019-Spring 2020)
- ENPH 353 - 2019 Term 2
- ENPH 253 (Summer 2019)
- Guides for 459/479
- ENPH 480/481
- Info for Project Sponsors
- Available Projects
- Hennings 115
- Lab Resources
- Student Awards
- Sign-Up Page
- Jobs
- Events and Talks
- Course Archive
- APSC 278 - 2018March
- ENPH 259 - presentations (2017 Nov)
- Sign-Up Page (APSC 101)
- Arduino (CUEBC 2016)
- COMM 386p (fall 2016)
- COMM 386p (Spring 2016)
- BAEN 580B (2015)
- BAEN 580B (2014)
- BAEN 542 (2013)
- Arduino Hands-On (2015)
- APSC 150 (Feb 2015)
- APSC 150 (Sept 2014)
- APSC 150 Tut 1.4 (Jan 2013)
- ENPH 459 (fall 2014)
- APSC 150 - electronics (2013)
- APSC 150 - Hand Tools (2013)
- IGEN 230 - mini-bootcamp (2012)
- PHYS 350 - projects (2017Jan-Apr)
- ENPH 479 (fall 2017)
- ENPH 479 (fall 2016)
- ENPH 479 (fall 2015)
- ENPH 479 (fall 2014)
- ENPH 479 (2013)
- ENPH 479 (2012)
- ENPH 479 - 2011/12
- APSC 479 - 2010/2011
- APSC 479 - 2009/10
- ENPH 459 (Fall 2018-Spring 2019)
- ENPH 459 (fall 2017)
- ENPH 459 (fall 2016)
- ENPH 459 (fall 2015)
- ENPH 459 (2013)
- ENPH 459 (2012)
- ENPH 459 - 2011/12
- APSC 459 - 2009/10
- APSC 459 2010/2011
- ENPH 253 (2018)
- ENPH 253 (2017)
- ENPH 253 (2016)
- ENPH 253 (2015)
- ENPH 253 (2014)
- ENPH 253 (summer 2013)
- ENPH 253 - 2012
- Phys 253-2011
- PHYS253 - 2010
- Phys 253 2009
- MINE 432 - Fall 2014
- PHYS 350 - projects (2011/12)
- MINE 432 - Fall 2010